10 Ways to Save an Hour a Day

For those in the data management community, including roles such as database administrators (DBAs), data architects and data stewards, there has never been a more challenging period to effectively
manage data assets within organizations. With data growing at mind-bending speed and the demand for new and diverse applications further driving data growth, these professionals are seeking ways to
be more productive and ultimately be free to focus on and meet their respective service level agreements (SLAs).

Data management professionals therefore need to automate as much as possible in addition to creating boilerplate-like processes to their jobs. This article will outline ten helpful ideas for making
your workflow more productive as a data management professional, identifying where appropriate tooling or other approaches may be implemented to raise productivity and help automate repetitive


    Modeling should not be characterized as a “use only at the beginning” technology for solely creating new database applications. Integrating the right
    modeling tool into your existing database’s change management life cycle will provide effective time savings.

    Select a modeling tool that facilitates clear articulation of required business changes with non-technical employees, but will also automatically calculate and generate syntactically correct
    database modification code allowing developers/DBAs to leverage. This process saves laborious and often error-prone coding cycles measuring hours within a work day. Moreover, it ensures
    predictability and repeatability by the operator and serves as an excellent resource for training newcomers to a database platform’s required SQL alteration. This will quickly foster an
    understanding of the appropriate database vendor-specific approach to safely and successfully modify the structures and re-apply dependencies.


    Today, DBAs are required to manage massive infrastructures consisting of a variety of database platforms and thus must swivel their chairs continually from Oracle
    duties to SQL Server duties to IBM DB2 duties … and so on. Frequently run operations such as back-ups, consistency checks (DBCCs), table alterations, index creation, security establishment,
    etc. need to be learned in hours and mastered in days across all managed databases. Database software will come supplied with its own management tooling, but mastering those and their immense
    depths will inject a new set of problems obstructing the DBA from quickly learning the database itself. Look for tools that can manage lots of database types from one interface and allow the DBA
    to learn one common path to success. This will allow DBAs to repeat successes quickly and efficiently no matter what database they are “thrown.”


    Data architects and stewards receive countless and often redundant requests for reports on data … e.g., where specific data is located, what type it is, the
    quality and state of the data, etc. This is most often used in data integration projects stemming from marketing and/or sales requests.

    Data architects should be looking for ways to standardize an approach to find information quickly. This allows architects to move away from constant one-off requests and reports. Wikis such as
    Microsoft SharePoint and Atlassian’s Confluence are now staples of an organization and easily understood by anyone who can use an Internet browser. Data stewards can leverage their tools
    (modeling or likely office productivity tools such as Microsoft Excel) to create and manage content and auto-generate this content to the Wiki. Consumers of the data are notified in real time of
    metadata changes through standard and familiar protocols such as RSS (e.g., like they receive their news updates) and allow sophisticated searching.

    The productivity benefits here are related to developing a pattern of behavior data that stewards desire from their customers. This ultimately reduces the repetitive queries of those searching
    for similar data values/metadata and publishing this content in a way consumers will appreciate.


    “Eye candy” by way of dials, blinking lights and gauges sold plenty of database performance software in years past, but did little to abstract complexity and
    certainly didn’t take into consideration the explosion of data we’ve seen in the last 3-4 years, tripling the number of databases born requiring management. Today, a typical DBA on average will
    personally manage 12-24 database instances (likely containing a multitude of “databases”) (1) with extreme cases measuring between 40-60 and more.

    Tooling that will identify, for the DBA, what changed since the last time the database was working is key for success. Quick visual identifiers such as looking at configuration settings of a
    database install or structural changes to objects like indexes or procedures are often the culprit and easily restored to their optimal states, saving hours on the day looking for needles in a


    Why should the wheel continually be reinvented? Data modelers should strive to create and publish a library of reusable data structures to ensure standardization
    and reuse. Software development has been wildly successful with implementations such as the Gang of Four (GoF) UML patterns for software construction, and database development should be no

    Architects can document and advertise common structures and associations/rules that developers continually need to recreate such as Bill of Materials, address patterns or singletons such as a
    Customer table with all the required fields and data types. The time savings here is baked into the continual reuse and requires no downstream modification or extensive code to
    “cleanse” or transform the data when it is re-purposed or moved via ETL jobs. Developers also will think less on these common structures and spend more time on critical aspects of the


    Poorly written SQL is not always the sole perpetrator of database performance problems. The design itself may be flawed. Low cost commercial tooling exists, and
    should be evaluated, that can scan the schema of a database to point out what should be fairly obvious contributors to performance degradation. Scanning for weak index design on tables as well as
    performing normalization checks to look at the number of joins a query will need to go through to access data are often overlooked on the original design, or are errantly changed (most frequently
    related to indexes) resulting in degraded performance. Applying tooling to perform these tasks automatically against the schema versus bolstering hardware or continually re-tuning code will
    provide major time saving benefits.


    If you haven’t done so already, run, don’t walk to your PC and download one of a variety of open source or low-cost to free virtualization platforms such as
    VMWare Server or Citrix’s XenServer. For those standardized on Microsoft Windows servers, its 2008 release will offer Hyper-V technology offering virtualization at its very core. For a DBA who
    is constantly trying to meet the demands of developers who need allocation to develop and test their code against databases, DBAs can migrate and build an entirely “clean” version of
    the application on the OS the developers require while allowing a safe and quarantined environment for development. Moreover, the environment can be “re-set” by the DBA to return it to its
    original state at any time, which is incredibly effective for time savings. Virtualization is becoming increasingly popular as a platform to run production systems, so DBAs should make it a point
    to familiarize themselves with its benefits.


    As compliance reporting becomes more pervasive and uptime requirements more critical, take advantage of readily available commercial tools to periodically save
    off your performance and security settings, as well as structural information inside your most critical databases. This way, you can always look back and see what things looked like before, and
    understand how things have changed in an event where unwarranted access may become a reality.


    Carrying on the theme above, real time status of who is accessing data is an equally progressive trend in the data center for security and compliance needs. DBAs
    should look for tooling that will monitor data traffic to database instances, but in a way that will not degrade performance. In the past, turning logging on and then reviewing log files when
    needed was effective, but as user loads increased and response-time SLAs shrunk, logging became a detriment to a database’s optimal performance. Tooling that will sniff and parse out packets of
    information traveling to the database to perform operations like queries by entering through specific ports should be evaluated as the most optimum for a databases performance.


    Developers who are writing code for a variety of platforms require assistance to ensure their code is error free and optimized on the first try. The alternative
    unfortunately is writing code, inputting into production and then iterating by re-writing until it gets fixed. Look for tooling that will provide advice to the developer such as when to inject
    database specific optimization features (e.g., “use an Oracle HINT here … “) or will parse existing names and structures to ensure appropriate connections and will also validate

Share this post

Greg Keller

Greg Keller

Greg is a seasoned technologist, product manager, and product marketer with a marked passion for all things database-related. Greg brings more than 14 years of experience in commercial software product management and marketing to his role as Chief Evangelist for Embarcadero, where he is responsible for driving product strategy across the company's worldwide community. He previously led Embarcadero's product initiatives as Vice President of Product Management. Prior to joining Embarcadero, Greg served in key sales and product evangelism positions for the System Architect product line at Popkin Software and Systems (now IBM). Greg is a regularly featured panelist and speaker at data modeling and data management conferences, is on the editorial board for various industry publications, and is a regular contributor to numerous data management columns and discussion groups. He earned his bachelor's degree from Syracuse University's Maxwell School of Citizenship.

scroll to top